![]() TasksService - TasksService provides methods for managing tasks relating to Incidents.ĪctivityService provides access to incident activity.You can also assign roles and update labels. IncidentsService - IncidentsService provides the ability to query, get, declare (create), update, and manage Incidents programatically.You can post notes to the timeline, and query and update the individual timeline items. ActivityService - ActivityService provides access to incident activity.The Grafana Incident JSON/HTTP RPC API is made up of the following services: Examples use the Go client library, but the API is the same for all SDKs. I do not understand why you feel we have the obligation to do all that for you or for anyone for free and get surprised if we are not willing to be just an open relay service for push notification.įor these reasons, I'll not engage further in this conversation.This page describes the entire API surface in detail. But guess what? If you want to do so, you will have to create accounts with Google and Apple, sign terms of services, validate your address with Dun & Bradstreet, and pay yearly fees. ![]() How can you say "There will be no escape from that." when you can, like many people did, get the code for the mobile apps, and compiled your own apps, that won't use any of the servers we pay to maintain. We simply cannot force anyone to do anything. ![]() Do you know what it means? It means you can use it any way you want. All the source for the apps is open source. We are not "forcing you to have a cloud account". You are the one factually incorrect in A LOT of your statements. What do you mean by " economical with the truth about"? I had high regard for you, but you are definitely crossing a line here. (*) which despite being advised that logging in to your cloud account does not set cookies I have discovered it does - see Clearly some tie up with for payment services I you are really starting to upset me. I am against the way that it is being IMPLEMENTED. How many people really do? And that is how it works - the general assumption that stuff can be added and most people will not notice. Sure, the code is Open Source and you can inspect it. It makes you question what else are they are being 'economical with the truth about'? Half cock, badly implemented and lastminute dot com rushing around. The problem is they just aren't open and honest about all this stuff. with your 'cloud' account(*) that you are force to create (if you actually can as that seems pretty broken right now). That will log your individual instance with a name, address etc etc. I still suggest changing the DNS while waiting for an answer about privacy from RC.Īs they are now forcing you to have a cloud account they want to enforce a uniqueid to track your server usage. IMHO installedAt also is not really useful to check if there's an update for that specific platform. You're right, sending the uniqueId could be some privacy intrusion. This is really sad, and a complete vindication of why I chose to stop volunteering my time to help Rocket. Presumably the venture capitalist corporate mentality has now woven it's tentacles throughout what was once a really good organisation. I really thought you were better than this. This really is as low as you can go and you should be completely and utterly ashamed of your behaviour. I'd love to find where it tells me this happened, but I guess it is conveniently hidden. So, what would you call it then? How can I tell what else you can or cannot do? Relevant logs: Our code is open source, there are no back doors whatsoever. I am sure that few people realised you could do this, and there is nothing I can see in your policies that says you can.Īdministrators are still in full control over the configuration of their instance. ![]() May be I don't WANT notifications? Server Setup Information:Īpps. Who does it appear for? Just an admin, users? I have no control of this. Some sort of little Easter egg on a timer? No indication of this. How can you contact MY rocket.cat user when there is no Internal Hubot control anymore? And the instance is NOT registered with a token or apparently connected. If there is it has been sneaked in and enabled by default. No evidence to show if this can be controlled or stopped. Someone at Rocket has the ability to control some aspects of my server without my permission. I don't expect you to be able to control anything on my server without my express permission. See attached screenshots Expected behavior: RocketChat seem to have awarded themselves permission to push messages to my server via rocket.cat and a notification bar in my channels with a readme URL.īe logged into Rocket.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |